|Gray Sky chickens gathering for some Chaco Canyon Cafe leftovers|
It may interest you to know, however, that the eating-cholesterol-raises-cholesterol theory was laid to rest in 1952(!) and has stayed dead in further studies. One telling quote from Nina Teicholz's book:
...When Uffe Ravnskov, a Swedish doctor, upped his consumption of eggs from one to eight per day (about 1600 mg of cholesterol) for nearly a week, he made the remarkable discovery that his total cholesterol level went down...in fact, eating two to three eggs a day over a long period of time has never been shown to have more than a minimal impact on serum cholesterol for the vast majority of people.Never mind that, as Teicholz goes on to discuss, cholesterol levels don't even correlate with heart disease and the suite of Western diseases, unless you're talking small-particle LDL.
What does this mean for us?
Buy that dozen eggs. Heck--buy two dozen!
Teicholz goes on to laud the wonders of animal fats in a convincing way, full of plenty of studies, facts, figures, and so on, and I gleefully went back to frying in bacon fat and butter. She isn't the only one calling for the return of meat and whole dairy and animal fat in general. Remember how I said I'd take a look at Wheat Belly?
Well, I did. (You can read the full review on Goodreads.) Dr. Davis begins his beef with the hybrid wheats grown in America. (They aren't GMO, since they've developed these wheats the old-fashioned way, crossing different breeds to get the traits they want.) You name it, wheat causes it: obesity, diabetes, heart disease, GI issues, Celiac--acne, for crying out loud! Why does it seem like every new book blames everything wrong with the world on one thing, be it wheat, sugar, transfats, what-have-you?
The doctor's orders? Cut the wheat. But not only the wheat. Cut carbs, basically. Not only breads and pastas and cookies, but also "most fruit," black beans and pinto beans--I would name more forbidden items except that he lost me at black beans. Are you kidding me? Who could keep to such a diet, unless they were deathly allergic or at death's door?
Here's the problem #1 with most diet advice: it's unsustainable. Yes, you can do protein shakes for two weeks, but you sure can't do it for life. Yes, you can cut most carbs for weeks, but you sure can't do it for life.
Here's problem #2: you become a pain in the hindquarters when people want to feed you. I'm a firm believer in food bringing families and communities together. Barring food allergies, asking your hosts to accommodate your latest dietary endeavors is not fun. I had this problem when I read The Year of No Sugar. Man, was that family a nuisance! They weren't giving up sugar for any reason, as far as I could see, except to get a book contract, but everyone around them had to jump through hoops.
Here's problem #3: most diets are crazy expensive. Whether you have to buy the signature foods or whether you're going Paleo on your own. I don't see how going mostly-meat is even possible for the average wallet or for the planet. Dr. Davis claims you eat less on proteins and fats, and I believe he's probably right, but you still have to eat something, and that something is pretty pricey, when not supplemented by carbs.
[Climbing down off soapbox.]
Dr. Davis argues that abstinence is easier than allowing yourself tiny amounts because the carbs have an addictive element, and the man has a point. Every year when we do Sugar-Free January, I find going cold turkey way easier than having one dessert a week, but does this have to apply to fruit and black beans???
All that said, my family will continue to eat sandwiches, fruit, black beans, and the occasional sweet treat, along with our Market eggs and meat and cheese. If I have to give up something food-related, I think first in line would be the chemicals and additives found in processed food, but even that rule is flexible. If someone lovingly prepares me Hamburger Helper, salad from a bag, and brownies from a mix, I will say thank-you and enjoy...